ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Arcuate fasciculus cortico-cortical and axono-cortical evoked potentials with post-resection excitability changes in perisylvian glioma.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of arcuate fasciculus cortico-cortical evoked potentials (AF-CCEP) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (AF-ACEP) during perisylvian supratentorial tumor surgery, and examine whether morphology changes serve as electrophysiological biomarkers of postoperative language function. Methods: We analysed 19 patients with tumors involving or adjacent to the arcuate fasciculus across multiple tertiary centers. AF-CCEPs were elicited by monophasic stimulation toward the inferior frontal gyrus and recorded over the middle or posterior superior temporal gyrus; AF-ACEPs were obtained via subcortical bipolar stimulation. Primary outcomes explored N1 morphology pre- and post-resection, with subgroup analyses by tumor grade, location, montage, and anesthesia. Results: 822 AF-CCEPs and 134 AF-ACEPs were acquired intraoperatively; 133 and 37 matched recordings were included for analysis, respectively. Post-resection N1 peak amplitude increased cohort-wide, while onset latency remained stable. One patient demonstrated signal loss associated with postoperative aphasia. AF-ACEP amplitudes were higher under general anesthesia, in higher-grade tumors, and with proximity to the AF on tractography. Conclusions: AF-CCEP and AF-ACEP are feasible intraoperative adjuncts, with signal degradation associated with language morbidity. Post-resection amplitude increases may reflect intact AF conduction with increased cortical excitability following tumor removal. Significance: When awake craniotomy is contraindicated, AF-CCEP and AF-ACEP may represent a viable alternative for monitoring AF integrity and reducing postoperative language morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.