ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Identifying central positional vertigo to prevent diagnostic pitfalls: A case series and review of literature.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case series highlights the critical role of radiological imaging in patients presenting with positional vertigo initially suggestive of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) but ultimately attributable to central nervous system pathology. The objective is to raise awareness among clinicians and paramedical professionals regarding the importance of early imaging when atypical clinical features are present. We report 6 cases of central positional vertigo in patients aged 18-85 years (3 men and 3 women) initially referred for physiotherapy with a presumed diagnosis of BPPV. Detailed clinical analysis revealed red flags prompting neurological evaluation and neuroimaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) played a decisive role in all cases, enabling accurate etiological diagnosis. Imaging protocols included brain MRI with T1- and T2-weighted, FLAIR, diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping, susceptibility-weighted imaging when indicated, and postcontrast T1 sequences following gadolinium administration. Additional sequences such as constructive interference in steady state (CISS/FIESTA) were used when neurovascular conflict was suspected. Identified etiologies included cerebellar hemangioblastoma, vestibular migraine with radiologic findings, neurovascular compression syndrome, cerebellar atrophy, cerebellar meningioma, and midbrain ischemic stroke. MRI findings were essential for differentiating central from peripheral causes of positional vertigo and for guiding urgent management, particularly in vascular and tumoral conditions. In all cases, imaging corrected the initial misdiagnosis of peripheral vertigo and prevented inappropriate repositioning maneuvers. This case series underscores the importance of integrating clinical examination with early neuroimaging when positional vertigo presents with central warning signs. Brain MRI remains the gold standard for identifying central causes and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.