ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Chronic kidney disease outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in oncology, but long-term kidney outcomes in patients with pre-existing CKD (chronic kidney disease) are not well understood. We assessed CKD progression in patients with a baseline eGFR of 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m² who were treated with ICIs, comparing outcomes with those receiving chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Sheba Medical Center between 2015 and 2024. The primary outcome was a composite of new-onset end-stage kidney disease, initiation of kidney replacement therapy, or a >30% eGFR decline for at least 90 days. The secondary outcome was time to the first composite event. We used a Cox model with time-varying exposure and a propensity score-matched, new-user active comparator analysis to minimize selection bias. Results: Of 3468 patients treated with ICIs, 885 had a baseline of eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m²; 208 met the inclusion criteria for CKD progression analysis. The composite outcome occurred in 22% of patients, with a shorter time-to-event in CKD stage 4 than in CKD stage 3 (27 vs. 83 months; Conclusions: Among patients with eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m², systemic anticancer therapy carries a substantial risk of renal decline; however, ICIs do not increase the risk of CKD progression compared to chemotherapy. Outcomes are predominantly driven by baseline renal impairment and individual risk factors, highlighting the necessity of close renal monitoring rather than avoiding ICIs in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.