ArticleAJPM focus2026
A Statewide Recommendation for Opt-Out Syphilis Screening in Nonpregnant Adults: Rationale and Evidence-to-Decision Framework.
Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Syphilis rates have increased substantially across the U.S. over the past decade. In response, the Minnesota Department of Health reviewed and updated its screening recommendations. Methods: A scoping review was performed to identify published manuscripts and guidelines on syphilis screening. The Minnesota Department of Health reviewed national and local syphilis data (2016-2024), published evidence, and screening approaches from other jurisdictions. The final recommendation was based on decisional factors derived from the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework and an adaptation of evidence-to-decision that is specific to screening. Multiple factors were considered, including disease burden, treatment availability, screening accessibility, implementation feasibility, and access to health care. Results: Evidence shows that early detection and treatment of syphilis are highly effective. Opt-out screening models achieve greater uptake and case detection than risk-based screening approaches. On the basis of the findings, the Minnesota Department of Health endorsed a new universal, opt-out syphilis screening recommendation for all nonpregnant individuals aged 18-49 years. Conclusions: Universal opt-out screening for syphilis has the potential to reduce the syphilis disease burden in Minnesota. Other jurisdictions may wish to adopt similar policies and may do so by modeling this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.