Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564617›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Perceived anthropomorphism of AI and belongingness need: the sequential roles of liking and perceived emotional support.

Jinrui Tian, Boxuan Li, Ronghua Zhang, Xiaoliang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinrui Tian *School of Marxism, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Boxuan Li *School of Marxism, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ronghua ZhangSchool of Marxism, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoliang LiuSchool of Marxism, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines how perceived anthropomorphism of artificial intelligence (AI) is associated with users' belongingness need through liking of AI and perceived emotional support. Drawing on the three-factor theory of anthropomorphism, the Computers as Social Actors paradigm, social support theory, and the social surrogate hypothesis, we propose that users' human-like perceptions of AI are linked to belongingness-related motivation through a sequential socioemotional process. Methods: Survey data were collected from 473 college students with prior experience using AI tools or conversational AI assistants. Participants completed measures of perceived anthropomorphism of AI, liking of AI, perceived emotional support, and belongingness need. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the hypothesized four-factor model fit the data better than alternative models, providing preliminary evidence for the empirical distinctiveness of the focal constructs. Liking of AI and perceived emotional support each served as significant mediators in this association. In addition, the sequential indirect path from perceived anthropomorphism to liking of AI, perceived emotional support, and belongingness need was significant. Discussion: These findings suggest that anthropomorphic perceptions of AI are related to users' belongingness-related motivation through layered affective and socioemotional processes. The study contributes to human-AI interaction research by distinguishing liking of AI from perceived emotional support and by clarifying how anthropomorphic AI perceptions are associated with users' social-emotional experiences. The findings should be interpreted within the limits of the cross-sectional design and the outcome measure: belongingness need reflects users' desire for acceptance and connection rather than actual belongingness satisfaction.

Indexed as

belongingness needhuman–AI interactionliking of AIperceived anthropomorphism of AIperceived emotional supportsocial surrogate

Identifiers

PMID42564617
PMCPMC13444370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.