ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Predicting Step 2 CK Performance Using Automated Feature Selection and Nested Cross-Validation.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Given the recent transition of the USMLE Step 1 exam to a pass/fail system, evaluative emphasis is expected to shift toward the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (USMLE-CK) exam, prompting the need for advanced predictive models. In this study, we proposed a multiple linear regression approach incorporating automated feature selection to predict students' performance on the USMLE-CK exam. Methods: Our methodology integrated feature selection and model validation processes within a nested cross-validation (CV) framework to predict USMLE-CK scores. We conducted our analysis on data from four undergraduate medical student cohorts (Classes 2020 to 2023 inclusive, n = 117). A range of performance data was included for feature selection, including internal assessment data and National Board Medical Examination (NBME) Results: This led to the selection of a four-predictor model (adjusted-R Conclusion: Our approach effectively streamlined the process of building a predictive model by merging feature selection with model validation. By creating an interactive, user-friendly dashboard, we empower medical educators to predict students' USMLE-CK performance. This modeling and deployment approach holds promise for predicting student performances in other assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.