Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564497›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2026

Life threatening acute complication after routine catheter exchange-The importance of planning and preparedness in risk cases.

Yngve Forslin, David Andrei Patrauceanu, Maria Vinell, Octavian Petru Nitescu, Alexia Maria Neagu, Martin Delle

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yngve ForslinDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
David Andrei PatrauceanuFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Maria VinellDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Octavian Petru NitescuFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Alexia Maria NeaguFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Martin DelleDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular procedures after abdominal surgery may carry risks for serious complications. Radical nephrectomy is preferred for renal cell carcinomas but carries risks including hemorrhage (1.2%), abscesses (0.7%-6.1%). Percutaneous abdominal drainage procedures carry hemorrhagic risks in 1%-2% of cases. An 88-year-old male with recent left sided nephrectomy developed a retroperitoneal abscess requiring drainage. During routine catheter upsizing, massive hemorrhage occurred due to injury of the left renal artery stump by the larger catheter. Emergency endovascular intervention was performed. Initial aortic stent graft placement alone proved insufficient due to anatomical constraints. Complete hemostasis was achieved through adding coil embolization of the arterial stump, while the partial stent coverage prevented coil migration. This case emphasizes that routine interventional procedures can precipitate life-threatening complications even in experienced hands.

Indexed as

Abdominal compartment syndromeEndovascular interventionHemorrhage controlPercutaneous catheter drainageRadical nephrectomyRenal artery stumpRetroperitoneal abscess

Identifiers

PMID42564497
PMCPMC13444279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.