Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564492›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of psychological assessment2026

Psychometric validity and clinical utility of the GHQ-12 for screening psychological health in isolated, confined and unusual or extreme environments.

Charles H van Wijk, Chris J B Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of psychological assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles H van WijkDivision of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-417X
Chris J B MullerDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Economic and Management Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-3478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric validity and clinical utility of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in isolated, confined and unusual or extreme (ICUE) work environments in South Africa. Two occupational health surveillance cohorts ( Contribution: This study provides the first large-scale evaluation of the GHQ-12 in ICUE occupational environments in southern Africa. By combining psychometric evaluation with a clinically oriented grey-zone approach, it offers evidence to support how brief mental health tools can be applied to high-risk workplaces such as offshore vessels, submarines and polar research stations.

Indexed as

grey-zone thresholdsICUE environmentsoccupational mental healthresiliencescreeningSouth Africavalidity

Identifiers

PMID42564492
PMCPMC13444004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.