ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Comparing daily step counts between a hip and wrist-worn device in adults with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Wearable devices are increasingly used for measuring physical and physiological activity in daily life. Common appendicular symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), such as tremor and rigidity, could impact the accuracy of step counts when the device is worn in different body locations. Few studies have compared wrist- and hip-worn activity monitoring devices worn simultaneously in the home environment among adults with PD. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement in daily step counts between two identical devices worn simultaneously at the wrist and hip in patients with PD. Methods: Twenty-one individuals with PD wore Fitbit Inspire 2 devices simultaneously on the wrist and hip during waking hours for 7 days. Total step counts from both devices were obtained for each day. The agreement between devices was examined using an intraclass correlation coefficient. A Bland-Altman plot was used to visually examine agreement. Results: The mean (SD) step count collected by the wrist-worn devices was 5221 (4345) and 5371 (3936) for the hip-worn devices, with an average difference of 150 steps. There was good overall agreement between the two devices with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78, 0.88), which was visualized with the Bland Altman plot. Conclusions: In an independently ambulatory PD population, wrist- and hip-worn Fitbit devices showed good agreement when measuring daily steps, with the strength of agreement varying by overall step activity. These findings support the use of wrist worn activity devices in PD and their utility for capturing physiological metrics beyond step count, such as heart rate, activity intensity, and sleep quality, which cannot be captured with a hip-worn device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.