ArticleWearable technologies2026
A lightweight passive ankle exoskeleton with dual-phase energy harvesting and stiffness adaptation.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Passive exoskeletons offer several advantages, including lightweight design, simple structure, and inherent energy efficiency. Most existing passive exoskeletons rely on clutch mechanisms to control spring-based energy storage and release, typically focusing only on recovering biomechanical energy during the stance phase of gait. In this study, we propose and analyze a lightweight passive ankle exoskeleton capable of harvesting and releasing energy during both the stance and swing phases of walking. The device aims to enhance gait assistance while maintaining structural simplicity and minimizing weight. By integrating the optimal stiffness ratio between the stance and swing phases, derived from musculoskeletal model simulations, with previously established optimal stance-phase stiffness parameters, we determined a suitable stiffness coefficient for the swing-phase spring. To validate the design, we conducted comparative experiments on participants walking with exoskeletons configured with different stiffness coefficients. Spatiotemporal parameters, metabolic energy cost, and muscle activation patterns were analyzed to evaluate performance. The results demonstrate that the proposed exoskeleton effectively reduces Soleus muscle activation while increasing tibialis anterior activity, leading to a 6.84% reduction in walking energy cost compared to a nonassistive condition. Furthermore, energy recovery during the swing phase alone contributes an additional 1.67% reduction in energy expenditure, improving overall walking efficiency. The proposed design also eliminates complex clutch components, significantly simplifying manufacturing and reducing costs, thereby enhancing the applicability of passive exoskeletons in daily mobility and rehabilitation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.