ArticleTelemedicine reports
Teleconsultations for Hypertension Management in Rural Kazakhstan: A Two-Phase Service Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, Trust, and Feasibility.
Article in Telemedicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telemedicine in the Management of Arterial Hypertension in Rural Populations: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rural regions of Kazakhstan face persistent barriers to specialist access. Arterial hypertension (AH) remains highly prevalent, while limited digital literacy may restrict the uptake of telemedicine solutions. Objective: To evaluate medical and digital literacy, patient satisfaction, and perceived barriers associated with cardiology teleconsultations for AH in rural Kazakhstan, and to explore changes in patient trust and demographic differences between survey phases. Methods: A two-phase service evaluation was conducted. Phase 1 (offline, February 2023) surveyed rural adults with AH ( Results: In Phase 1, awareness of hypertension and complications was high (96% and 76%), but knowledge of risk factors was lower (78%). Most participants owned a BP monitor (81%) and could measure blood pressure at home (78%); 40% did so daily. Digital engagement was limited-73% were unfamiliar with "digital medicine," and 75% did not use health apps. In Phase 2, 82% of patients found teleconsultations convenient, and 90% rated remote care as excellent or good; 73% rated physician performance as excellent. Reported barriers included poor internet connectivity (43%), and most consultations occurred via mobile phones (92%). The mean participant age declined from 59 ± 11 years (offline) to 48 ± 13 years (online) (Welch's t Conclusions: Mobile teleconsultations for hypertension management were feasible, well accepted, and associated with a significant improvement in patient trust among rural populations. Targeted efforts to improve digital literacy and connectivity could enhance equitable adoption. Early economic signals support integrating teleconsultations into routine rural health care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.