Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564455›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2026

Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of administering daytime only enteral feeding compared to standard continuous enteral feeding, to reduce delirium in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults, with qualitative and circadian mechanistic sub-studies.

Jessie Welbourne, Helen Neilens, Liesl Wandrag, Rachel Clarke, Helen McKenna, Liana Stapleton, Ahilanandan Dushianthan, Kat Tapson, Tim Macdonald, Elis Wilson and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jessie WelbourneIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-3994
Helen NeilensPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Liesl WandragIntensive Care Unit, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rachel ClarkeIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0102-7777
Helen McKennaIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Devon, UK.
Liana StapletonIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Devon, UK.
Ahilanandan DushianthanNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Kat TapsonA Critical Illness Survivor, Plymouth, UK.
Tim MacdonaldPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Elis WilsonPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Helen HamblyPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Sree ArooriPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Paigan AspinallPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Chris RollinsonPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Victoria AllgarPeninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, UK.
Daniel MartinIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Devon, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Survivors of critical illness describe delirium as a significant problem. Delirium is multi-factorial in origin and known to be associated with disrupted circadian rhythms. The timing of enteral feeding contributes to circadian rhythms. We hypothesised that the normal practice of providing continuous enteral nutrition during critical illness may contribute to delirium, due to the adverse effects on circadian rhythms. Methods: DAYDREAM is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled feasibility trial conducted in two UK ICUs. Forty mechanically ventilated adult patients requiring enteral nutrition will be randomised 1:1 to receive either daytime-only feeding (08:00-22:00) or standard continuous enteral feeding. The primary outcomes are feasibility metrics, including recruitment, retention, intervention fidelity, and completeness of data collection. Secondary outcomes include delirium- and coma-free days (assessed using RASS and CAM-ICU), feeding intolerance, glycaemic control, ICU length of stay, and 90-day mortality. A nested qualitative sub-study will explore staff acceptability and implementation barriers. A mechanistic sub-study will evaluate circadian rhythmicity using physiological and biochemical markers between days 3 and 5 of ICU admission. Results: Recruitment commenced in December 2025, with completion anticipated in 2027. Findings will inform the design and delivery of a subsequent definitive multicentre trial. Conclusion: This study will determine the feasibility of implementing daytime-only enteral feeding in critically ill adults and provide preliminary data on its clinical and circadian effects.

Indexed as

critical illnessdeliriumenteral nutritionintermittent fastingnutritional supporttime restricted feeding

Identifiers

PMID42564455
PMCPMC13443336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.