ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2026
Automated Semisupervised Measurement of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter From CT Following Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Semisupervised Measurement of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter From CT Following Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) from computed tomography (CT) scans is clinically important, but deep learning methods are often limited by the scarcity of high-quality, expert-labeled data given the labor-intensive nature of manual segmentations. To address this, we present a fully automated modular pipeline combining deep learning and semisupervised learning techniques for ONSD estimation from axial head CT scans. The pipeline features three stages: (1) deep learning-based slice selection, (2) semisupervised machine learning for optic nerve segmentation utilizing both labeled and unlabeled publicly available data, and (3) geometric and morphological ONSD measurement. When validated on public and internal datasets, our approach generalized better than traditional supervised segmentation methods, achieving an intersection over union (IoU) of 0.561 ± 0.141 and Dice coefficient of 0.707 ± 0.131 on previously unseen data. Slice-wise measurement accuracy varied based on measurement distance from the ocular globe, yielding mean absolute errors as low as 1.779 and 1.899 mm for the right and left ONSD, respectively. Our findings highlight the potential for semisupervised deep learning to deliver fully automated ONSD measurements and the framework's adaptability to difficult medical imaging tasks even with limited, low-quality ground truth for training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.