SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Art therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Depression is among the leading causes of disability globally. Therefore, exploring the various non-medical treatment options for this condition is particularly important. The aim of the review was to assess the effect of art therapy on depressive symptoms. Methods: The foundation of this review is a pre-planned, explorative, secondary analysis of a previously published umbrella review, encompassing the databases Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, American Psychological Association PsycArticles, American Psychological Association PsycInfo, PSYNDEX, the German Clinical Trials Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Included were all randomized trials with any patient population receiving active visual art therapy. The outcome was depressive symptoms measured by depression assessment instruments. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and conducted a bias assessment using a modified Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data was pooled using a random-effects model and visualized in forest plots. A pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with hedges g was calculated to measure the reduction of depressive symptoms. Results: Of 3,100 identified reports we included 26 studies. Of these, 19 studies with 997 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Overall, we found a standardized mean difference of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.76) for depressive symptoms, favoring the intervention group. Main sources of variation were different types of control groups, methodological quality, and patient populations. Conclusion: Our results suggest that art therapy is associated with improved depressive symptoms. Therefore, art therapy should be accessible as complementary treatment for patients suffering from depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.