ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Tooth Extraction Outcomes and Complications in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform Evidence-Based Guidelines.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tooth Extraction Outcomes and Complications in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform Evidence-Based Guidelines.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus is known to cause long-term microvascular and macrovascular changes. These changes along with compromised inflammatory response have been known to affect the wound healing. However, the influence of diabetes on the healing process after tooth extraction has not been clearly established. With this background, this systematic review was conducted to compare the healing of extraction sockets and postoperative complications between diabetics and nondiabetics (control). Methodology: This systematic review was conducted as per the "MOOSE guidelines." A systematic search was performed in "PubMed," "Scopus," "EMBASE," and "Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source" databases. A comprehensive literature search that was conducted across multiple electronic databases yielded a total of 821 results. After removal of duplicates ( Results: A total of 500 diabetics and 364 controls were available from five included publications. Adjusted analysis reported that the mean socket size was larger among diabetics than the control group at the end of day 7. There was no significant difference in the distribution of delayed wound healing among diabetics and controls. With regard to complications like dry socket, bony sequestra, and infection, no statistical significance was established. On risk of bias assessment, one study was high quality, one was low quality, and the remaining three were of moderate quality. Conclusion: There is a lack of scientific evidence to suggest that diabetic patients with well-controlled glycemic status may have poor healing or increased risk of complications after dental extraction. Overall, there is a need for high-quality studies and the need for coordinated, multidisciplinary, and transnational efforts among relevant stakeholders to develop clear, evidence-based guidelines to address this gap and clinical ambiguity. In this context, based on our findings, we have proposed stage-wise recommendations to streamline the management of diabetic patients during routine dental procedures, ensuring seamless and evidence-based workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.