ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
From coal biodesulfurization to mine-soil remediation: a critical review of microbial sulfur transformation in coal-impacted environments.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coal biodesulfurization has traditionally been regarded as a pre-combustion clean-coal technology; however, its connections to sulfur cycling and remediation in coal-impacted soils have not been sufficiently integrated. This review addresses this gap by examining microbial sulfur transformations in coal, coal gangue, mine spoil, acid mine drainage systems, and reclaimed soils. The discussion encompasses pyritic sulfur biooxidation, organic sulfur biotransformation, sulfate reduction and metal sulfide precipitation, rhizosphere-mediated sulfur cycling, and the reuse of coal mine solid wastes in reclamation contexts. Drawing on these lines of evidence, the review proposes a systems-level, risk-controlled sulfur management framework that conceptualizes coal treatment and mine-soil remediation as interconnected microbial, mineral, hydrological, and ecological processes. The synthesis demonstrates that sulfur-transforming microorganisms may facilitate sulfur removal, waste stabilization, and vegetation recovery, or alternatively promote acidification, sulfate export, and metal mobilization. These outcomes depend on factors such as matrix accessibility, oxygen exposure, redox stability, hydrologic connectivity, buffering capacity, sulfur loading, and labile carbon availability. Future research should progress beyond isolated microbial screening and instead prioritize matrix-aware, field-validated, and risk-based strategies that integrate sulfur mass balance, contaminant mobility, and long-term reclamation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.