ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2026
Surgical Treatment of Pathologic Spinal Fractures in Osteoporosis: Two Clinical Cases.
Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporotic spine fractures are among the most prevalent fractures in patients with osteoporosis and pose significant challenges to surgical treatment. Achieving stable fixation of osteoporotic bone is technically challenging and has become an increasing concern in spinal neurosurgery in the aging global population. Numerous studies have described the biomechanical benefits of fixation devices and techniques; however, no standard of care has been identified to provide distinct spinal stabilization in these patients. This study reviews the existing evidence and explores the complexities related to the treatment of pathologic spinal fractures in the context of systemic osteoporosis. Description of clinical cases: We present 2 cases of pathologic osteoporotic spinal fractures with spinal canal compression treated surgically using a modified method that incorporates cemented cannulated transpedicular screws and interbody spondylodesis with cage placement. Patients were followed up for 24 months after surgery. The Visual Analog Scale score improved significantly, decreasing from 7.3 points before surgery to 1.2 points immediately after surgery and to 0.5 points at the end of the follow-up. Similarly, the Oswestry Disability Index improved from 69% before surgery to 41% immediately after surgery and to 20% after 2 years. The Cobb angle improved from 38.0° preoperatively to 29.0° immediately after surgery. No bone resorption around the screws was observed during follow-up. The combination of transpedicular fixation with vertebroplasty is safe and effective for treating osteoporotic spinal fractures. This approach yields satisfactory clinical and radiographic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.