Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564282›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Data-independent acquisition-based quantitative proteomics in plants.

Xin Chen, Yu Chen, Wen-Yao Zhang, Mo-Xian Chen, Patrick Willems, Fu-Yuan Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin Chen *State Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Yu Chen *State Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Wen-Yao ZhangState Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Mo-Xian ChenState Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Patrick WillemsDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Fu-Yuan ZhuState Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-independent acquisition (DIA)-based proteomics is increasingly becoming a standard procedure for comprehensive protein analysis in plant systems. This high-throughput approach is now extensively employed to characterize protein dynamics across various plant physiological processes including growth, development, and stress responses. Particularly in plant science, this approach facilitates the discovery of novel disease resistance proteins and regulatory pathways involved in plant defense mechanisms. Continuing advancements in DIA proteomics methodologies bolster its sensitivity, reproducibility, and throughput, thus broadening its utility in botanical research. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the myriad applications of DIA proteomics in elucidating biological processes and molecular mechanisms with a primary focus on plants. Ultimately, it underscores the pivotal role of DIA proteomics in advancing our understanding of plant biological systems, while also discussing future directions and challenges in the field.

Indexed as

data-independent acquisition (DIA)high-throughput screeningplantsquantitative proteomicsSWATH-MS

Identifiers

PMID42564282
PMCPMC13442457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.