Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

DBENet: Dual-Branch Encoder Network for brain MRI lesion segmentation.

Qiang Zhao, Zhaohui Zhang, Tinghua Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiang ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, China.
Zhaohui ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Tinghua CaoDepartment of Radiology, Bishan District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate brain lesion segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains challenging due to heterogeneous lesion appearance, variable scales, and ambiguous boundaries. Methods: We propose DBENet, a Dual-Branch Encoder Network for brain MRI lesion segmentation. The spatial and frequency branches first extract lesion-related features from complementary domains. The Spatial and Frequency Fusion (SFF) module then integrates these features into a hybrid lesion representation. In parallel, lesion-aware prompts are encoded by the Segment Anything Model (SAM) prompt encoder to generate prompt embeddings. Finally, the Multi-scale Attention Fusion (MAF) module takes the hybrid representation and prompt embeddings as inputs, and progressively integrates them across scales for contextual modeling and boundary refinement. Results: Extensive experiments on the ISLES 2022 and BraTS 2018 datasets demonstrate that DBENet outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving Dice scores of 0.8621 and 0.8261, respectively, while providing superior lesion localization and boundary delineation. Ablation studies confirm the complementary benefits of SFF and MAF. Discussion: Furthermore, DBENet achieves a favorable balance between segmentation accuracy and computational cost, supporting practical implementation under moderate hardware constraints. Future work will extend DBENet to volumetric 3D segmentation. We will also investigate multimodal learning and foundation-model adaptation to improve robustness across diverse imaging protocols.

Indexed as

brain lesiondeep learningDual-Branch Encoder NetworksegmentationSpatial and Frequency Fusion

Identifiers

PMID42564280
PMCPMC13442951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.