ArticleFrontiers in neurology
DBENet: Dual-Branch Encoder Network for brain MRI lesion segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate brain lesion segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains challenging due to heterogeneous lesion appearance, variable scales, and ambiguous boundaries. Methods: We propose DBENet, a Dual-Branch Encoder Network for brain MRI lesion segmentation. The spatial and frequency branches first extract lesion-related features from complementary domains. The Spatial and Frequency Fusion (SFF) module then integrates these features into a hybrid lesion representation. In parallel, lesion-aware prompts are encoded by the Segment Anything Model (SAM) prompt encoder to generate prompt embeddings. Finally, the Multi-scale Attention Fusion (MAF) module takes the hybrid representation and prompt embeddings as inputs, and progressively integrates them across scales for contextual modeling and boundary refinement. Results: Extensive experiments on the ISLES 2022 and BraTS 2018 datasets demonstrate that DBENet outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving Dice scores of 0.8621 and 0.8261, respectively, while providing superior lesion localization and boundary delineation. Ablation studies confirm the complementary benefits of SFF and MAF. Discussion: Furthermore, DBENet achieves a favorable balance between segmentation accuracy and computational cost, supporting practical implementation under moderate hardware constraints. Future work will extend DBENet to volumetric 3D segmentation. We will also investigate multimodal learning and foundation-model adaptation to improve robustness across diverse imaging protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.