ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Aggregates-on-chip: a microfluidic device for crowding plant cells in culture.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Microfluidic devices enable the study of cellular properties in a highly controlled environment while allowing close observation. One important aspect of a plant cell's environment is the influence of neighboring cells on cell growth through chemical signals and mechanical forces. However, while the use of microfluidics in plant cell biology has expanded in recent years, very few systems provide cell-cell contact together with long-term growth and imaging. Methods: Here, we develop a microfluidic device that uses arrays of cylindrical cups to gently capture and confine multiple protoplasts into stable aggregates, generating a constrained microenvironment with cell-to-cell contact. Results: The device addresses a key challenge wherein aggregating cells can create hypoxic, media-starved environments that rapidly lead to cell death. The porous micro-post design supported sustained media flux through confined aggregates, reducing limitations typically associated with dense cell clustering. The platform maintained sterile culture conditions and enabled convenient media switching, as demonstrated by hormone treatment and salt-stress assays. Protoplasts from Arabidopsis thaliana and Zea mays remained viable for more than two weeks. Over this period, cells showed growth, cell wall formation, and cell divisions, with divisions occurring significantly more frequently in crowded aggregates than in isolated cells. Discussion: This aggregates-on-chip platform provides a controlled and live-imaging system for studying how cell-cell contact and microenvironmental cues influence plant protoplast behavior. By integrating physical confinement, continuous perfusion, and chemical perturbation, the device offers a technical advance for long-term studies of plant cell growth, regeneration, division, and stress responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.