Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564184›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Integrated lung-diaphragm ultrasound in pediatric weaning assessment: a mini review.

Yunrui Zhuang, Xingyu Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yunrui ZhuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Tongxiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Tongxiang, China.
Xingyu ZhuDepartment of Pediatrics, Tongxiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Tongxiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning from mechanical ventilation remains a major challenge in pediatric critical care. Diaphragm ultrasound has emerged as a promising bedside, radiation-free tool for assessing respiratory muscle function. However, the value of diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) in neonates and children remains heterogeneous rather than definitive. While several pediatric studies have reported potentially useful DTF thresholds, often around 20%-25%, other cohorts and physiological validation studies have shown weak or inconsistent associations with extubation outcomes or inspiratory effort. These discrepancies likely stem from developmental differences in diaphragm structure and function, high chest wall compliance in children, disease heterogeneity, varying ventilator settings, and technical challenges in obtaining reliable measurements in small patients. Importantly, DTF reflects only one aspect of the respiratory pump and does not evaluate pulmonary factors that increase breathing workload, such as atelectasis, pulmonary edema, consolidation, or poor lung aeration. Lung ultrasound can complement diaphragm assessment by identifying these sources of increased respiratory load during spontaneous breathing trials and after extubation. This mini-review summarizes the current evidence on diaphragm and lung ultrasound for pediatric weaning assessment and proposes an integrated PUMP-LOAD framework: diaphragm ultrasound to evaluate respiratory pump function and lung ultrasound to assess pulmonary load. Although physiologically sound and clinically feasible, this combined approach requires standardized pediatric protocols, age-specific reference values, and prospective multicenter validation before it can reliably guide extubation decisions.

Indexed as

diaphragm thickening fractiondiaphragm ultrasoundextubation readinesslung ultrasoundmechanical ventilationneonatespediatric critical careweaning

Identifiers

PMID42564184
PMCPMC13442432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.