Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564167›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Postoperative Urinary Retention After General Surgical Procedures: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Short-Term Outcomes.

Prabhat Kumar N, Naveen Ch, Trisha C, Muralidhar Chinnapaka, Ramachakra Kushal Thota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prabhat Kumar NInternal Medicine, NIMRA Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Vijayawada, IND.
Naveen ChGeneral Surgery, Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.
Trisha CInternal Medicine, Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, IND.
Muralidhar ChinnapakaPharmacology, Government Medical College and Hospital Maheshwaram, Hyderabad, IND.
Ramachakra Kushal ThotaInternal Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a frequent but sometimes missed complication after general surgical procedures. If not recognized early, it may cause bladder overdistension, patient discomfort, urinary tract infection, unexpected catheterization, delayed mobilization and longer hospital stay. This study was conducted to determine the incidence, associated risk factors, and short-term outcomes of POUR in patients undergoing general surgical procedures.

methodsThis prospective observational study included adult patients who underwent elective or emergency general surgical procedures under spinal, regional, or general anesthesia. Patients with pre-existing urinary retention, chronic catheterization, neurogenic bladder, or known obstructive uropathy were excluded. POUR was defined as failure to void within six to eight hours after surgery, associated with suprapubic discomfort, bladder distension, or bladder volume requiring catheterization. Data regarding demographic profile, comorbidities, type and duration of surgery, anesthetic technique, perioperative intravenous fluid volume, postoperative opioid use, and early postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

resultsA total of 220 patients were included in the study. POUR developed in 32 patients (14.5%), while 188 patients (85.5%) did not develop urinary retention. POUR was more common in patients aged above 60 years (16/63 (25.4%)) than in those aged 60 years or below (16/157 (10.2%)). Male patients had a higher frequency of POUR (22/112 (19.6%)) compared with female patients (10/108 (9.3%)). Higher occurrence was also observed among patients with diabetes mellitus (12/50 (24.0%)), lower urinary tract symptoms (10/30 (33.3%)), spinal anesthesia (21/89 (23.6%)), operative duration >90 minutes (17/65 (26.2%)), perioperative intravenous fluid administration >1500 mL (20/83 (24.1%)) and postoperative opioid use (23/105 (21.9%)). Patients who developed POUR had higher rates of repeated catheterization, urinary tract infection, delayed mobilization, catheter-related discomfort, and longer hospital stay.

conclusionPOUR is an important early postoperative complication in general surgical patients. Advanced age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, pre-existing lower urinary tract symptoms, spinal anesthesia, prolonged surgery, higher perioperative fluid administration, and postoperative opioid use were associated with increased risk. Careful preoperative risk assessment, early bladder monitoring, and timely intervention may help reduce catheter-related morbidity and support smoother postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

bladder monitoringgeneral surgeryhospital staypostoperative complicationspostoperative urinary retentionpourrisk factorsspinal anaesthesiaurinary catheterisationurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID42564167
PMCPMC13442307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.