ReviewHepatology forum2026
Embolization of spontaneous portosystemic shunts for refractory hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis patients:A meta-analysis.
Review in Hepatology forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Hepatic encephalopathy is an important cause of morbidity in cirrhosis patients. The presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) is associated with an increased risk of recurrent/refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Embolization of SPSS has been shown to improve HE symptoms, but it may worsen portal hypertension and related complications. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPSS embolization for recurrent/refractory HE. Materials and Methods: Five databases were screened to identify studies assessing the efficacy of SPSS embolization for HE. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates, and I2% values were used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 331 patients with recurrent or refractory HE despite medical management. The etiology of cirrhosis included ethanol abuse, chronic viral hepatitis, MASH, and others. Following embolization, 82% of patients had HE-related clinical improvement, and 71% of patients became free from HE-related hospitalization. The mean difference in pre- and post-embolization serum ammonia levels was 104 [77-130], p<0.01. Worsening portal hypertension following embolization presented as gastrointestinal bleeding (10%), new or aggravated varices (15%), and new or aggravated ascites (15%). Conclusion: SPSS embolization demonstrated improvement in HE-related clinical symptoms with a decreased need for hospitalization, but it exacerbates portal hypertension, increasing the risks of ascites, varices, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of SPSS embolization against standard medical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.