Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42564103›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The puzzle of scientific progress: cultivating problem solvers.

Mariana Araújo-Pereira, Bruno B Andrade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mariana Araújo-PereiraLaboratory of Clinical and Translational Research, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Bruno B AndradeLaboratory of Clinical and Translational Research, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human nature is paradoxical. People often recognize problems but hesitate to act, preferring the familiarity of discomfort to the uncertainty of change. This reluctance to embrace the unknown is not just a personal tendency; it extends to science and society at large, where progress is often stalled by fear of disruption. To overcome stagnation, it is increasingly important to educate and develop problem solvers, or in other words, dissolvers of chaos-those who transform disorder into understanding, uncertainty into insight. This conceptual commentary explores the mindset of problem solvers, examining how they approach complexity not as an obstacle, but as a puzzle to be solved. Just as assembling a jigsaw puzzle requires patience, adaptability, and the ability to identify connections, solving real-world problems demands a willingness to navigate uncertainty, persist through failure, and engage in deep, iterative thinking. We examine historical and anecdotal examples of resistance to change, discuss the cognitive and social barriers that discourage deep problem-solving, and propose strategies for fostering a new generation of problem solvers. By shifting perspective, from seeing problems as obstacles to recognizing them as opportunities to build new knowledge, bit by bit, we can cultivate individuals who not only navigate complexity but embrace it as the foundation of progress.

Indexed as

educationproblem solverpsychologysciencescientific progress

Identifiers

PMID42564103
PMCPMC13441965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.