ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Realistic anatomical model reconstruction and high-fidelity flow computation in stented coronary arteries for the analysis of in-stent thrombosis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: This article aims to develop and validate a methodology for realistic anatomical reconstruction of stented segments from optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiographic images and the computation of local haemodynamic forces using computational fluid dynamics, towards a more realistic haemodynamic characterisation in coronary atherosclerotic lesions post-PCI. Methods: Three-dimensional anatomical models of stented vessels (6 silicone models Results: The reconstruction error distance was smaller with the REFINED approach than with the conventional approach, in both the silicone and patient models [8 (2-15) μm vs 23 (10-54) μm, Conclusions: The REFINED approach outperforms the conventional method in reconstructing stent geometry and has been shown to be effective in facilitating a high-fidelity computation of the highly disturbed local haemodynamic environment. This demonstrates its potential role in examining device failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.