ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
University students' perceptions of social media use and intellectual security: a cross-sectional study in Egypt.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intellectual security-understood as critical awareness, balanced judgment, and resilience to manipulative or extremist persuasion-is shaped within digital environments. This study examined university students' perceptions of social media and of media institutions' role in countering extremist discourse. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 384 undergraduates at Port Said University, Egypt, recruited through non-probability convenience sampling. The researcher-developed questionnaire included demographic and platform-use items, a 20-item scale assessing the perceived awareness-oriented role of social media in intellectual security, and a 5-item scale assessing the perceived institutional-media role in countering extremism. Pilot validation involved 164 cases. Analyses included reliability testing, principal-axis factoring, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and model diagnostics. Results: Internal consistency was Discussion: Students perceived intellectual security as linked to digital engagement, critical interpretation, and institutional communication. These findings reflect associations rather than causal platform effects, direct exposure to extremist content, or demonstrated institutional effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.