ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for major postoperative adverse events in elderly colon cancer using firth regression: a large-scale retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elderly patients with colon cancer are at increased risk of major postoperative adverse events, but existing risk assessment tools often require detailed clinical or laboratory information. We developed and internally validated a rapid prediction nomogram using routinely available administrative variables. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 4, 942 elderly patients with colon cancer from five hospitals. Major postoperative adverse events were identified using a predefined ICD-10 code-based algorithm adapted from the Healthgrades patient-safety framework. Given the low event rate, Firth penalized likelihood regression was used to develop the prediction model. Internal validation was performed using 1, 000 bootstrap resamples. Model performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis. Results: Independent predictors included payment method (medical insurance: OR = 2.630), admission type (outpatient: OR = 0.501), surgical approach (minimally invasive: OR = 0.473), and comorbidity index (OR = 1.041). The full model showed moderate discrimination, with an apparent AUC of 0.724 and a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.709. The apparent and bootstrap-corrected Brier scores were 0.0244 and 0.0247, respectively. Decision curve analysis suggested potential net benefit across threshold probabilities of 1%-51%. Conclusion: This nomogram may serve as a rapid, low-cost preliminary screening tool for estimating the risk of major postoperative adverse events in elderly patients with colon cancer. External validation and further refinement using more detailed clinical, nutritional, oncological, and functional variables are needed before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.