ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Augmenting SOFA-2 with immune markers to capture dysregulated host response in patients with suspected infection.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The updated SOFA-2 score excludes the immune system due to specificity concerns, creating a conceptual gap given that sepsis is defined by a dysregulated host response. We hypothesized that augmenting SOFA-2 with widely available immune markers-white blood cell counts, lymphocyte counts, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)-would improve mortality prediction in patients with suspected infection. Methods: We analyzed 75,203 adult patients from the MIMIC-IV, MIMIC-III, and eICU databases. We constructed an immune-augmented SOFA-2 model using provisional consensus criteria for cell counts and data-driven thresholds for NLR derived via generalized additive models. Discrimination was evaluated using random-effects meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results: The immune-augmented model significantly outperformed standard SOFA-2 across all cohorts. In the pooled analysis, the immune-augmented SOFA-2 yielded a higher AUROC (0.750 [95% CI, 0.715-0.785]) compared to standard SOFA-2 (0.740 [95% CI, 0.712-0.768]; p=0.003). Additionally, incorporating immune markers improved clinical risk stratification, resulting in a significant pooled total NRI of 0.046 (95% CI, 0.014-0.078; p=0.005). Conclusions: Excluding the immune system limits the ability of the SOFA-2 score to capture the dysregulated host response essential to severe infection. Integrating immune markers significantly enhances prognostic accuracy and risk reclassification for patients with suspected infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.