ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2026
Developmental Milestones for Children With Down Syndrome: Revised Estimates Using Moving Average Summaries.
Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Children with Down syndrome follow distinct developmental trajectories that require specialized monitoring and counseling. We aimed to provide updated estimates of developmental milestone attainment using a nonparametric approach and to compare these results with previously reported generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) estimates. Methods: We reanalyzed developmental data from 842 children with Down syndrome (ages 2 months to 24 years). For each milestone, achievement rates were calculated within overlapping 0.5-year time windows, and shape-constrained additive models were used to derive monotonic regression curves. Results: Compared with GLMM-based estimates, the nonparametric approach predicted milestone attainment at least 1 year earlier for 17 of 25 milestones at the highest comparable percentile. Early gross motor milestones showed consistent achievement patterns across methods, whereas more complex adaptive, language, and academic skills demonstrated greater variability and were more sensitive to modeling assumptions. Females achieved 17 of 25 milestones at least 1 year earlier than males. Conclusions: These findings highlight substantial developmental heterogeneity and support the potential for continued skill acquisition throughout childhood and adolescence in individuals with Down syndrome. The updated estimates provide clinically relevant reference points to guide individualized monitoring, anticipatory guidance, and family counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.