ArticleCureus2026
Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Splinted Crowns on a Hemisected Tooth: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the stress distribution on splinted crowns made of two different materials placed on hemisected teeth using finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study employed FEA to assess the stress distribution on the remaining dentin after placing two types of splinted crowns made of different materials on hemisected mandibular first molar models. Two hemisected mandibular first molar models were used for the study. The root canals of both models were filled with gutta-percha by FEA simulation. The splinted crown was the coronal restoration placed on the hemisected mandibular first molar and its adjacent tooth, the mandibular second molar. In the first model, a lithium disilicate splinted crown was placed, and in the second model, a zirconia splinted crown was placed. Using a three-dimensional finite element model, both crown models were subjected to loading and tested. Static loads of 450 N and 600 N were sequentially simulated on both models in vertical and oblique directions to the occlusal plane, and their maximum von Mises stresses were obtained using FEA.
resultsUnder a 450 N load, the maximum stress for the lithium disilicate splinted crown was 60.889 MPa on the adjacent tooth and 49.858 MPa on the hemisected tooth restored with the lithium disilicate splinted crown, whereas the maximum stress for the zirconia splinted crown was 61.421 MPa on the adjacent tooth and 49.034 MPa on the hemisected tooth restored with the zirconia splinted crown. Under a 600 N load, the maximum stress for the lithium disilicate splinted crown was 81.185 MPa on the adjacent tooth and 66.478 MPa on the hemisected tooth restored with the lithium disilicate splinted crown, whereas the maximum stress for the zirconia splinted crown was 81.824 MPa on the adjacent tooth and 65.547 MPa on the hemisected tooth restored with the zirconia splinted crown.
conclusionThis study concludes that zirconia splinted crowns transferred numerically less stress to the hemisected tooth than lithium disilicate crowns; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The use of splinted crowns in hemisected teeth significantly improves stress distribution and reduces the load on the remaining tooth structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.