ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2026
Expert Consensus on Real-World Use of Trofinetide for Rett Syndrome Using a Modified Delphi Method.
Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Predictors of Persistence Among Males with Rett Syndrome Treated with Trofinetide.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Rett syndrome: MECP2 biology, multisystem pathophysiology, and the evolving therapeutic landscape.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Real-World Treatment Landscape of Individuals with Rett Syndrome Treated and Untreated with Trofinetide in the United States.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Trofinetide Use and Treatment Patterns Among Children Aged 2-4 Years with Rett Syndrome in the United States: A Retrospective Specialty Pharmacy Linked Claims Database Analysis.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Trofinetide is the first approved treatment for Rett syndrome (RTT) in the United States and Canada. Trofinetide improved the core symptoms of RTT in clinical trials, and real-world evidence supports the findings of clinical trials. As RTT experts in the United States have now gained nearly 3 years of real-world experience with trofinetide, a modified Delphi process was conducted in the United States to establish consensus recommendations for the practical use of trofinetide in the treatment of RTT. Methods: A multidisciplinary steering group of five trofinetide-experienced RTT experts practicing at an International Rett Syndrome Foundation (IRSF)-designated center of excellence convened and developed 72 consensus statements across six domains: first-line use, pre-treatment assessment, initiation, benefit evaluation, tolerability management, and discontinuation strategies. The statements were then assigned a 4-point Likert scale for testing via email by the Delphi panel identified by the steering group. Consensus was reached for individual statements if they met the pre-specified consensus threshold of ≥ 75% agreement. Results: Two rounds of assessments were completed by 25 respondents in each round, resulting in agreement ≥ 75% being reached across the final statement set. The consensus supports trofinetide as the standard of care for eligible patients with early initiation and an individualized approach to titration to maximize efficacy and tolerability. The panel reflected the steering group's view that trofinetide is efficacious. While side effects can emerge with trofinetide, they are manageable in most cases. Conclusions: Recommendations highlight a flexible, patient-centered approach to trofinetide use to optimize efficacy while addressing tolerability challenges and supporting adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.