ReviewAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2024
Pediatric intracranial hypertension: A review of presenting symptoms, quality of life, and secondary causes.
Review in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of surgical and interventional radiology procedures for pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Head Growth and Fundoscopy as Proxies for Intracranial Pressure in Metopic Synostosis Treated Surgically vs Conservatively.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Predicting OCT retinal ganglion cell volume from pattern ERGs and VEPs in children with suspected optic neuropathy in a tertiary referral setting.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Awareness of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children among pediatricians in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our understanding of primary (idiopathic) intracranial hypertension has evolved in recent years. There have been efforts to rename the disorder as pseudotumor cerebri syndrome or primary intracranial hypertension. Some studies have suggested a higher threshold opening pressure to define intracranial hypertension. The reported annual incidence varies from 0.6 to 0.9 per 100 000 children around the world. Patients are typically divided into prepubertal and pubertal groups, with pubertal patients having the same risk factors as adults. Prepubertal patients do not share these risk factors. They are more likely to be asymptomatic, have equal gender distributions, and are less likely to be obese. Headache is the most common presenting complaint, followed by vision changes and nausea/vomiting. A newer concept of fulminant intracranial hypertension has emerged, defined as acute onset with rapid progression of visual deficits or papilledema. Quick insertion of a temporary lumbar drain as a bridge while medical management reaches effectiveness improves visual outcomes and helps avoid permanent shunt placement. Headache is typically the first symptom to resolve with treatment, and papilledema resolves in five to six months. Recurrence rates in children and adolescents range from 28.5% to 36.4%, with higher rates after puberty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.