ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2026
Retrospective, Multicenter Study of Lacosamide to Treat Neonatal Seizures.
Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lacosamide Boluses Decreased Seizure Burden and Were Well Tolerated in Neonates With Acute Seizures: A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series.Journal of child neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Most antiseizure medications (ASMs) are prescribed off label for neonates. Lacosamide's efficacy in infants and availability in intravenous formulation suggest potential utility for neonates. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of lacosamide for neonatal seizures. Methods: This 10-center, retrospective study of neonates with seizures and lacosamide treatment initiated by ≤ 48 weeks postmenstrual age collected clinical data from medical records and electroencephalogram recordings. Lacosamide efficacy was determined by changes in seizure burden with lacosamide treatment and seizure cessation by hospital discharge. Potential adverse events were reviewed. Results: Among 62 eligible neonates, 33 had acute provoked seizures while 29 had neonatal-onset epilepsy; there was no difference in seizure type or baseline seizure severity between groups. There were high rates of pretreatment status epilepticus (48%) and treatment-resistant seizures, with 93% receiving ≥ 3 ASMs before lacosamide. Most received intravenous lacosamide, with a median loading dose of 5.0 mg/kg and median daily dose of 7.3 mg/kg. Seizure cessation occurred in 37% of neonates; 21% had no additional ASM administered after lacosamide. Seizure burden, measured in seizure minutes per hour, was lower at both 4 h and 7 days following lacosamide administration. In addition, there was a median reduction in seizure frequency of 30 seizures per day at 7 and 30 days posttreatment ( Summary: Despite high rates of treatment-resistant seizures in this neonatal cohort, 37% experienced seizure cessation and most remained on lacosamide at hospital discharge. Most adverse events were not attributed to lacosamide. These results favor use of lacosamide and provide a rationale for future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.