ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2024
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in a patient with a brain-responsive neurostimulation device.
Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the most common cause of epilepsy-related mortality. Although most witnessed SUDEPs follow seizures, mechanisms are uncertain. Investigations into the pathophysiology of SUDEP have relied on models and rare recordings of brain function at the time of the event. The brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS) device from Neuropace offers a therapeutic option for drug-refractory epilepsy (DRE), enabling the recording of brain activity and the preemptive termination of seizures. Therefore, patients who experience SUDEP while being treated with an RNS device can provide insights into neural activity at the moment of this event. Objective: We report the history and electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings of a patient with DRE who experienced SUDEP years after RNS placement. Patient History: A girl with Phelan-McDermid syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome had an RNS device implanted at the age of 14 to treat DRE. Initially, electrodes were positioned in the right orbitofrontal (OF) and right premotor frontal regions, with the OF lead later changed to the centromedian thalamic nucleus. At age 19, the patient was found unconscious and in cardiac arrest by her parents. Although spontaneous circulation returned en route to the hospital, the patient did not regain consciousness and died. Subsequent analysis of ECoGs from RNS recordings at the time of death indicated seizure onset in the right premotor frontal cortex, which persisted despite seizure termination attempts by the RNS. Conclusions: We present a patient with SUDEP associated with the onset of RNS-refractory seizures. The significance of this report is highlighted by the rarity of literature on neuronal function at the time of SUDEP. Moreover, it underscores the potential for devices capable of monitoring ECoG activity to shed light on the mechanisms underlying SUDEP and to inform interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.