Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563831›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2025

Classification of self-care patterns in Korean adults with prediabetes using unsupervised machine learning: a secondary data analysis.

Mi-Kyoung Cho, Myoung-Lyun Heo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mi-Kyoung ChoDepartment of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-1149
Myoung-Lyun HeoDepartment of Nursing, Jeonju University, Jeonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3712-2357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to classify self-care patterns among Korean adults with prediabetes using an unsupervised machine learning approach. The classification was grounded in Orem's Self-Care Theory, focusing on self-care demands, self-care agencies, and self-care behaviors. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2023 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Variables were selected and categorized according to the theoretical components of Orem's model. Principal component analysis was applied for dimensionality reduction, followed by K-means clustering to identify distinct self-care pattern groups. All variables were standardized using min-max normalization. Group differences were examined using analysis of variance and the chi-square test. Results: Three self-care pattern groups were identified: the high self-care performance group, the latent self-care risk group, and the self-care vulnerable group. These groups exhibited distinct profiles across self-care demands, agencies, and behaviors. Significant intergroup differences were also observed in education level, income, health literacy, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c levels. Conclusion: Self-care patterns among adults with prediabetes can be effectively classified through unsupervised learning techniques. The findings highlight the importance of developing tailored nursing interventions that consider multidimensional self-care profiles. This study underscores the applicability of Orem's Self-Care Theory and demonstrates the potential of machine learning in identifying at-risk subgroups for early intervention.

Indexed as

Cluster analysisMachine learningNursingPrediabetic stateSelf care

Identifiers

PMID42563831
PMCPMC13268341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.