ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2025
Landscape of Advanced Practice Provider Responsibilities in Pediatric Neurology.
Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A worldwide shortage of pediatric neurologists, combined with increased demand, increased wait times, and clinician burnout, have led to substantial access limitations. Given these challenges, we need to ensure advanced practice providers (APPs) in pediatric neurology are utilized effectively. Our results provide a framework for optimizing modern pediatric neurology practice through a thoughtful consideration of APP integration. Methods: A survey was sent through two large neurology academic organizations. Emails were also sent to known professional contacts across 59 practice sites. An electronic survey in REDCap with 31 open-ended or multiple-choice questions about demographics, supervision, inpatient and outpatient clinical processes, procedures, and scholarly activities was sent. Results: Surveys were completed from 29 sites. Sixteen of these sites (55%) reported APPs do not have demographic restrictions in their outpatient practice. At many practice sites APPs perform inpatient consultations, with variable models for independence and partnership with attending neurologists. APPs subspecialize frequently and perform a variety of procedures including lumbar punctures and headache treatment injections. Conclusion: Most US-based APPs in outpatient pediatric neurology practice autonomously and also frequently perform procedures. APP independence in the inpatient setting should be expanded. As pediatric neurology practices evolve, information regarding the landscape of APP clinical responsibilities will aid in increasing access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.