ReviewJournal of Korean biological nursing science2026
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on depression in adult women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on depressive symptoms in adult women by synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for RCTs published between January 2020 and November 2025. Eligible studies included women aged ≥ 18 years, vitamin D supplementation as the primary intervention, and assessment of depressive symptoms using validated instruments. Two independent reviewers performed study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool. Results: Four RCTs (n = 18,628 participants) were included. Three trials enrolled women with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes and concomitant vitamin D deficiency, whereas one large trial enrolled adults aged ≥ 50 years without baseline depression. Interventions ranged from 2,000 IU daily to 50,000 IU weekly for 6 months to 5.3 years. Two trials demonstrated significant reductions in depressive symptoms with high-dose supplementation (25,000~50,000 IU weekly) in women with comorbidities and vitamin D deficiency ( Conclusion: High-dose vitamin D supplementation may be associated with reductions in depressive symptoms among women with vitamin D deficiency and metabolic comorbidities, whereas low-dose supplementation appears to confer limited preventive benefit in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.