ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2024
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict prediabetes using dietary intake data in young adults in Korea: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting prediabetes in young adults in Korea using dietary intake data and to identify the most effective model. Methods: Data from the ninth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used, with 823 participants aged 19-35 years selected after excluding those with missing data. Logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, and random forest models were applied to predict prediabetes, and the analysis was conducted using the Orange 3.5 program. Five-fold cross-validation was performed to reduce performance variability, and test data were used for final model validation. Results: In the dataset, 14%-15% of participants were classified as having prediabetes. The random forest model showed the highest performance in terms of classification accuracy, harmonic mean of precision and recall, and precision. Logistic regression had the highest performance regarding the model's ability to distinguish between individuals with and without prediabetes. Age, thiamine intake, and water intake emerged as the most important predictors. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the utility of using dietary intake data to predict prediabetes in young adults. The random forest model provided the highest prediction accuracy, supporting early detection and intervention, which could help to reduce unnecessary treatment. This highlights nurses' important role in educating patients about lifestyle changes and implementing preventive care. Future studies should incorporate additional factors, such as psychological and lifestyle variables, to improve the model's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.