Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563808›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2026

[Characteristics and clinical outcomes of cancer patients presenting to the emergency department in Korea: a retrospective descriptive study].

Hyun Bin Kim, Eun Ji Seo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to characterize cancer patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and to identify factors associated with ED length of stay (LOS) and 72-hour revisits. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of adult cancer patients who visited the ED of a tertiary hospital in Seoul between June and November 2023. Among 21,495 ED visits, 2,225 met the inclusion criteria. Variables included general characteristics, cancer-related characteristics, and ED visit-related characteristics. Outcomes were ED LOS and 72-hour revisits. Data were analyzed using the t-test, analysis of variance, chi-square test, multiple linear regression, and logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 64.75 ± 14.85 years, and 51.0% of patients were men. Gastrointestinal cancers were the most common cancer type (49.6%), and abdominal pain was the most frequent chief complaint (17.4%). The mean ED LOS was 245.93 ± 189.79 minutes, and the 72-hour revisit rate was 5.4%. Factors associated with longer ED LOS included older age, previous ED visits, off-hours arrival, higher acuity, ambulance transport, abnormal respiratory rate, and administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, or opioids. Factors influencing 72-hour revisits included the absence of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, abnormal systolic blood pressure, and admission. Conclusion: For older cancer patients with high acuity who visit the ED by ambulance during off-hours, early assessment of dyspnea and prior ED utilization, along with prompt symptom-based pharmacologic interventions, is recommended. At discharge, providing education tailored to the patient's clinical condition, including DNR status, admission status, and vital signs, and ensuring early outpatient or telephone follow-up may strengthen continuity of care and reduce short-term ED revisits.

Indexed as

Emergency medical servicesLength of stayNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID42563808
PMCPMC13268344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.