ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2024
Thermoelectric tourniquet-assisted thermotherapy and cryotherapy for pain, regional blood flow, and satisfaction with intravenous injections among hospitalized patients in Korea: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Cryotherapy and Thermotherapy Using an E-TEET on Pain, Stress, and Satisfaction Among Patients and Healthcare Providers During Intravenous Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- The effects of thermotherapy and cryotherapy on pain and fear during intravenous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2025Review
- Effects of an intervention combining warm therapy with a digital distraction app on pain, stress, and satisfaction during intravenous catheterization in South Korea: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intravenous injections are a common invasive procedure for delivering fluids or medications. Although patients experience pain from needle insertion, this discomfort is often overlooked due to its short duration and perceived insignificance. This study aimed to assess the effect of applying cryotherapy and thermotherapy using a flexible thermoelectric device on relieving the pain caused by intravenous injections. Methods: This randomized controlled trial utilized the modified thermoelectric element (M-TEE) tourniquet, which improves heat and cold transfer through a flexible TEE. Participants were hospitalized adults who had an 18-gauge angiocatheter inserted for surgery. The M-TEE tourniquet was applied 10-12 cm above the injection site, providing thermotherapy (40°C-45°C) or cryotherapy (0°C-10°C) to the respective groups. The control group received no temperature treatment. Pain, peripheral oxygen saturation, pulse rate, and regional blood flow were measured. Post-injection, satisfaction surveys were conducted with participants and practitioners. Results: There was a significant difference in pain perception among the three groups (F = 3.38, Conclusion: The M-TEE tourniquet effectively reduces intravenous injection pain and increases patient and practitioner satisfaction, particularly with cryotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.