ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2025
[Evaluating the radiation safety effect of ultraviolet-blocking curtains during portable X-ray examinations in the emergency department: a comparative experimental study].
Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the radiation shielding effectiveness of general hospital curtains and ultraviolet (UV)-blocking curtains in emergency departments by measuring the spatial distribution of scatter-radiation dose rates during portable X-ray examinations. Methods: Four shielding conditions were assessed: no curtain, a general hospital curtain, a 99.9% UV-blocking curtain (V2), and a combination of two UV-blocking curtains (V2 & V7). Spatial dose rates were measured at six locations surrounding a simulated patient bed: Feet 0°, Right 0°, Horizontal 45°, Feet 0° & Vertical 30°, Right 0° & Vertical 30°, and Horizontal 45° & Vertical 30°. All measurement points were set 150 cm from the phantom center to simulate the distance between the patients and the surrounding beds. Results: At a distance of 150 cm horizontally from the phantom, the spatial dose rate was lower when a 99.9% UV-blocking curtain was used than when a general hospital curtain or no curtain was used. Among all curtain types, the V2 & V7 99.9% UV-blocking curtains demonstrated the highest shielding efficiency. The lowest spatial dose rate was observed at Feet 0°, where a bed tray was present, while the highest was at Right 0° & Vertical 30°. Conclusion: In beds equipped with the V2 & V7 99.9% UV-blocking curtains and tray, radiation exposure can be minimized by positioning personnel at the foot of the patient. These findings support the use of UV-blocking curtains as a convenient shielding method during portable X-ray procedures in emergency departments. The findings may also guide caregivers and patients to safer positions during examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.