ArticleThoracic cancer2026
Overall Survival With Pyrotinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Pooled Analysis.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhase II and III trials have demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of pyrotinib plus capecitabine over lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, long-term overall survival (OS) data from a single-center cohort remain limited. This pooled analysis compared OS between the two regimens and explored outcomes across prespecified subgroups.
methodsWe included patients with HER2-positive MBC from our center enrolled in a Phase Ic study, a Phase II study, or the Phase III PHOEBE trial. The primary endpoint was OS. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank tests, and a multivariable Cox model adjusted for ECOG performance status, pathological grade, prior anti-HER2 therapy, trastuzumab exposure duration, trastuzumab resistance, and prior chemotherapy lines. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals. Exploratory subgroup analyses used prespecified categories.
resultsAt data cutoff, 82 patients were included; 53 received pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 29 received lapatinib plus capecitabine. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median OS was 74.61 months (95% CI 41.10-not reached) with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 30.98 months (26.12-50.76) with lapatinib plus capecitabine (log-rank p = 0.0053). Cox models suggested a reduced risk of death with pyrotinib plus capecitabine. Subgroup analyses were exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously because several subgroup estimates were imprecise.
conclusionIn this single-center pooled analysis, pyrotinib plus capecitabine was associated with significantly longer OS than lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive MBC. These exploratory results are consistent with prior Phase II/III trials and provide evidence supporting the OS benefit of pyrotinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.