Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563499›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026

A Rare Case of Storage Mite Anaphylaxis in Infancy.

Eliza Kluckow, Katie Frith

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eliza KluckowDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-4632
Katie FrithDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is one of the first reported cases of storage mite anaphylaxis in Australia, occurring in an infant who had two episodes of severe anaphylaxis, triggered by previously tolerated foods. Both episodes occurred following extended periods of food storage, and in both instances, the child required two doses of intramuscular adrenaline. Skin prick testing was negative to implicated foods, but demonstrated sensitisation to house dust mite, and serum-specific IgE confirmed storage mite sensitisation. Clinician recognition of this condition is essential for timely diagnosis and implementation of preventive measures to reduce further episodes of life-threatening anaphylaxis in at-risk patients.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisDust Mite AllergyFood HypersensitivityPyroglyphidaeAnimalsEpinephrineFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EInfantMaleSkin TestsEpinephrineImmunoglobulin Eanaphylaxisatopyhouse dust mite

Identifiers

PMID42563499
PMCPMC13448357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.