ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Investigating enzyme function by geometric matching of catalytic motifs.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating enzyme function by geometric matching of catalytic motifs.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- EnzymeSifter: a tool for discovery of industrial enzymes from metagenomes.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapidly growing universe of predicted protein structures offers opportunities for data driven exploration but requires computationally scalable and interpretable tools. We developed a method to detect catalytic features in protein structures, providing insights into enzyme function and mechanism. A library of 6780 3D coordinate sets describing enzyme catalytic sites, referred to as templates, has been collected from manually curated examples of 762 enzyme catalytic mechanisms described in the Mechanism and Catalytic Site Atlas. For template searching we optimized the geometric-matching algorithm Jess. We implemented RMSD and residue orientation filters to differentiate catalytically informative matches from spurious ones. We validated this approach on a non-redundant set of high quality experimental (n = 3751, <40% amino acid identity) enzyme structures with well annotated catalytic sites as well as predicted structures of the human proteome. We show matching catalytic templates solely on structure is more sensitive than sequence- and 3D-structure-based approaches in identifying homology between distantly related enzymes. Since geometric matching does not depend on conserved sequence motifs or even common evolutionary history, we are able to identify examples of structural active site similarity in highly divergent and possibly convergent enzymes. Such examples make interesting case studies into the evolution of enzyme function. Though not intended for characterizing substrate-specific binding pockets, the speed and knowledge-driven interpretability of our method make it well suited for expanding enzyme active-site annotation across large predicted proteomes. We provide the method and template library as a Python module, Enzyme Motif Miner, at https://github.com/rayhackett/enzymm and as a webserver at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/m-csa/enzymm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.