Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563400›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Monte Carlo simulations of

Martyna Araszkiewicz, Katarzyna Tymińska, Urszula Kaźmierczak, Patrycja Chuchała, Jarosław Grzyb, Patrycja Kamińska, Roch Kwiatkowski, Marta Maleszewska, Aneta Malinowska, Kamila Maliszewska-Olejniczak and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martyna AraszkiewiczFaculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna TymińskaNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Urszula KaźmierczakHeavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Patrycja ChuchałaFaculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław GrzybNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Patrycja KamińskaFaculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Roch KwiatkowskiNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Marta MaleszewskaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Experimental Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Aneta MalinowskaNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Kamila Maliszewska-OlejniczakDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Bohdan PaterczykImaging Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka KorgulFaculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonte Carlo simulations constitute a well-established methodology for the quantitative characterization of PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to perform a rigorous dosimetric characterization of an irradiation system utilizing a

methodsA comprehensive geometric and material characterization of all irradiation system components was conducted. Cellular dimensions and culture medium thickness were quantified using confocal microscopy. A computational representation of the setup was implemented in the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code to determine

resultsThe simulations revealed homogeneous particle fluence across the exposed cellular monolayers. The simulated

conclusionsThe present study emphasizes the necessity of precise dosimetric modeling for

Indexed as

Alpha ParticlesAmericiumLinear Energy TransferMonte Carlo MethodRadiation DosageRadiometryAmericiumAmericium-241alpha particleglioblastomaLETMonte Carlo

Identifiers

PMID42563400
PMCPMC13447975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.