ReviewJournal of neurochemistry2026
Microtubules in Spinal Cord Injury: From Cytoskeletal Dysregulation to Therapeutic Regeneration.
Review in Journal of neurochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers an immediate and sustained disruption of the composition and organization of the neuronal cytoskeleton. Radical alterations in axonal and dendritic microtubules characterize both the acute injury phase and the protracted recovery period. For decades, researchers have sought to correct these microtubule defects as a therapeutic strategy to encourage axonal regeneration, collateral sprouting, and the functional rewiring of neuronal circuits. Recent studies have demonstrated that taxol and related microtubule-active drugs improve outcomes in rodent models. These benefits are achieved by preventing microtubule depolymerization, stabilizing existing polymers, and promoting new assembly within both afflicted neurons and the glial cells essential for repair. While these findings highlight the therapeutic potential of microtubule-based interventions, we posit that successful clinical translation necessitates a more sophisticated approach rooted in the growing knowledge of microtubule-related proteins and their intricate regulatory mechanisms. This review evaluates progress in this arena, specifically examining the microtubule interactome network that includes structural microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) such as Tau, MAP1A, MAP1B, MAP2, and MAP6, as well as the stathmin family, plus-end tracking proteins, and microtubule-severing proteins such as fidgetin and spastin. In addition, we analyze the contribution of molecular motor proteins and regulatory MAPs, including CRMP2 and CRMP4, as well as upstream transcription factors governing their expression. Finally, we address convergent regulation through kinases such as GSK3β and CDK5, which represent a central mechanistic axis linking injury signaling to cytoskeletal failure. By integrating data from studies on development and regeneration into a unified mechanistic model, we provide a framework for microtubule-based therapeutics for SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.