ArticleMusculoskeletal care2026
"Direct Access Physiotherapy and Medical Task Sharing and Shifting, I'm on Board, But There Are Some Caveats": A Qualitative Study Exploring Family Physicians' Conditional Acceptability and Perceptions of New Physiotherapy Models of Care in French Primary Care.
Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn France, two care models have recently been introduced to improve access to physiotherapy for patients with musculoskeletal complaints: direct access to physiotherapists (PTs) and medical task sharing and task shifting between family physicians (FPs) and PTs. While these models aim to improve timely access to non-pharmacological care, French FPs' perceptions and acceptability remain largely unexplored.
objectiveTo explore French FPs' acceptability and perceptions regarding direct access physiotherapy and FP-PT task sharing and task shifting for patients with musculoskeletal complaints in primary care.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 18 FPs, with one FP included per French region (18 regions). Twenty-seven FPs were contacted and 18 agreed to participate. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed in NVivo using an inductive thematic analysis informed by Braun and Clarke's six phases. Saturation was operationalised as the absence of substantially new codes or candidate themes during iterative analysis; this threshold was reached after 14 interviews and confirmed by four additional interviews.
resultsFPs described both models as acceptable in principle, but not unconditionally. For direct access, they emphasised the need for clear patient selection criteria, structured training, clinical guidelines, and secure communication channels. For task sharing and task shifting, acceptability depended on formal protocols, competence assurance, and explicit medico-legal accountability. Across both models, a cross-cutting tension emerged: FPs reported high confidence in PTs they knew and worked with, while simultaneously questioning the readiness of the profession to assume expanded responsibilities without stronger governance.
conclusionFrench FPs did not reject these models, but their acceptance was cautious, conditional, and strongly context dependent. Implementation will likely require staged deployment, postgraduate training pathways, shared information systems, and explicit legal and organisational safeguards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.