ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Beyond the Initial Ictus: Timing of WFNS Grade Assessment and Outcome Prediction in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo identify the clinical timepoint of World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grading that provides the highest prognostic accuracy for short- and long-term outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).
methodsIn this cohort study of 389 patients, WFNS grades were recorded at first medical contact, hospital admission, immediately pre-occlusion, and 48 h post-occlusion. Functional outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge, 1 year, and at least 2 years after ictus. Prognostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and compared across timepoints with DeLong's test.
resultsPrognostic accuracy varied significantly between assessment timepoints. Across all outcomes, WFNS grading at 48 h post-occlusion demonstrated the highest discriminative power. For functional outcome at discharge, the area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.817 for GOSE and 0.845 for mRS, exceeding all values obtained from earlier assessments. The prognostic accuracy remained superior at the 1 year follow-up (GOSE AUC 0.844, mRS AUC 0.823) and at long-term follow-up after 2 years or more (GOSE AUC 0.819, mRS AUC 0.784). DeLong's Test confirmed the significantly better predictive performance 48 h post-occlusion compared with all earlier timepoints, whereas no significant differences were observed among the earlier timepoints.
conclusionsThe WFNS assessment at 48 h post-occlusion provides a better prediction of both short- and long-term functional outcomes after aSAH compared with earlier evaluations. This timepoint may more accurately reflect a stabilized neurological status and could be used in addition to the WFNS scale obtained at admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42563043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.