Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563041›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Beliefs About Working with Health Problems and Support at Work as Predictors of Sick Leave at Post-treatment and at Follow-Up: Secondary Analyses of a Randomised Controlled Trial with Registry Data.

Marianne Tranberg Bjørndal, Ragne Gunnarsdatter Hole Gjengedal, Kristian Pihl Frederiksen, Hilde Dallavara Lending, Kåre Osnes, Marit Hannisdal, Odin Hjemdal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marianne Tranberg BjørndalDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway. Marianne.bjorndal@diakonsyk.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4973-9307
Ragne Gunnarsdatter Hole GjengedalDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6528-3596
Kristian Pihl FrederiksenDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde Dallavara LendingDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.
Kåre OsnesDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.
Marit HannisdalDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.
Odin HjemdalDivision of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postboks 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-2345

Funding

the Southern and Eastern Norwegian Regional Health Authority Grant number 2019066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigates the predictive value of the newly identified factors Beliefs about working with health problems and Support at work for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders. The aim was to explore the validity of the two factors in a new sample, investigating the factor structure, reliability and construct validity. Further the predictive value was assessed from pre-to post-treatment and at 6- and 12-months follow-up using sick leave data from national registries.

methodsThe study had a longitudinal design conducting secondary analyses with data from a randomised controlled trial (N = 236). The patients filled out self-report questionnaires and sick leave data were collected from national registries.

resultsThe principal component factor analysis identified the two factors, Beliefs about working with health problems and Support at work, with strong internal consistency α = 0.79 and 0.85 respectively. At pre-to post-treatment both factors separately predicted number of days on sick leave. Beliefs about working with health problems also predicted number of days on sick leave from post-treatment to 6- and 12-months follow-up.

conclusionThese findings highlight key predictors for return to work. Beliefs about working with health problems is especially important, predicting up to 12-months post-treatment. These factors can easily be assessed and addressed in therapy and increased focus may help more patients return to work.

Indexed as

Beliefs about working with health problemsCommon mental disordersPredictors for return-to-workSick leaveSupport at work

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.