Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563020›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Neurogenic bladder in the multiple sclerosis population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and a proposed evaluation algorithm.

Vasileios Giannopapas, Evangelia Makrina Dimitriadou, Dimitrios K Kitsos, Alexandra Akrivaki, Maria-Ioanna Stefanou, Konstantina Stavrogianni, Athanasios K Chasiotis, John S Tzartos, Daphne Bakalidou, Georgios Tsivgoulis and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vasileios GiannopapasSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Evangelia Makrina DimitriadouSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios K KitsosSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alexandra AkrivakiSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria-Ioanna StefanouSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantina StavrogianniSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios K ChasiotisSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
John S TzartosSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Daphne BakalidouInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Research, Education and Disability Support (IREDS Lab), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Caring Professions, University of West Attica, Attica, Greece.
Georgios TsivgoulisSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios P ParaskevasSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos TsamisDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Sotirios GiannopoulosSecond Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. sgiannop@uoi.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-5179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurogenic bladder (NGB) is one of the most common and debilitating manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS), substantially impairing quality of life and increasing the risk of secondary complications.

objectiveTo determine the pooled prevalence of NGB and its subtypes in people with MS (PwMS).

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO. The MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E scale. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-intercept generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with logit transformation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out analysis and prediction intervals.

resultsTwenty-two studies comprising 39,304 PwMS were included. The pooled prevalence of NGB was 48.8% (95% CI: 34.1-63.7%). Subtype analyses showed pooled prevalences of 39.1% for storage symptoms, 21.4% for voiding symptoms, and 40.9% for mixed symptoms. Meta-regression did not identify significant associations between NGB prevalence and age, EDSS, or disease duration. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses indicated that heterogeneity (I² > 97%) was primarily attributable to differences in diagnostic definitions, assessment instruments, and study design rather than demographic or clinical characteristics.

conclusionsNGB affects approximately one in two PwMS with the prevalence ranging from 6 to 94%. Standardized screening and assessment strategies are warranted to improve early identification and optimize care pathways.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMultiple SclerosisUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicHumansPrevalenceLower urinary tract dysfunctionMeta-analysisMultiple sclerosisNeurogenic bladderPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID42563020
PMCPMC13447475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.